Re: Exponents and notation

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg29896] Re: Exponents and notation
• From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 02:08:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
• References: <200107160428.AAA13406@smc.vnet.net> <9j0h49\$fim\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Hi,

there is a good reason. Every high precision arithmetic must store
the number of the digits somewhere (in a base you like).
Typical the digit number is not a high precision number itself.
The overflow comes from the fact that for

2^3^4^5

Mathematica needs more than the number of allowed digits.
May be, that a 64-Bit Mathematica will help (for Sun's).

BTW the HP is wrong because

In[]:=
x = 2.^3^4;
xx = x*x*x*x*x

Out[]=
8.263199609878108*^121

but we can get an other result with

In[]:=x^5
Out[]=8.263199609878108*^121

*and* it is a *bug* that none of the results above generate an
Overflow[] (as it should) but 2.^3^4^5 does.
Only the Overflow[] result is correct.

Regards
Jens

>
> Hmm, this is the first I've seen the 'General::"ovfl": "Overflow occurred in
> computation."' message.  If I try a different calculation, say 8^8^8, I
> don't get an overflow, but instead Mathematica just happily tries to find
> the results (but I'm not holding my breath).
>
> > Is the HP wrong ?
> >
> >
>
> Well it would seem to be grouping the operators differently, but there may
> be a good reason for this?
>
> > L.DERUYCK
> > mailto:dr01202 at pophost.mediring.be
> >
>
> Michael

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Memory Conservation
• Next by Date: non-commuting objects with dummy indices
• Previous by thread: Re: Exponents and notation
• Next by thread: Capability of Mathematica