Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg31038] Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?
- From: "Mark S. Coleman" <mcoleman at bondspace.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 01:22:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Greetings, Is there an "inverse" to the ToRules function? That is, a function that converts rules to equations (expressed in == form), which could then be used in the Solve function? Thanks, Mark
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?
- From: Tomas Garza <tgarza01@prodigy.net.mx>
- Re: Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?