|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg35232] RE: [mg35214] Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 05:13:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Try using the third form of Collect with h = Simplify.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
> From: AES [mailto:siegman at stanford.edu]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
>
> I have a long expression f that involves integers times various
> powers of symbols b and x, i.e.
>
> f = ratio of two lengthy polynomials in b and x
>
> If I series expand this in x , viz.
>
> fS = Series[f, {x, 0, 2}] // Normal
>
> I get an answer in the form
>
> fS = c1 x + c2 x^2
>
> where the coefficients c1 and c2 in the resulting series expansion
> come out as rather messy expressions (ratios of polynomials). In my
> problem, however, these coefficients actually happen to simplify
> substantially (since there are common factors in their numerators and
> denominators), and I'd like to have them in simplified form. But if I
> write
>
> fS // Simplify
>
> I'm back in lengthy polynomial form; and if I try something like
>
> fS = (Coefficient[fS, x] // Simplify) x +
> (Coefficient[fS, x^2] // Simplify) x^2
>
> I get an expression that looks great, but will not evaluate numerically.
>
> Any easy way around this?
>
Prev by Date:
Examples using Trig option
Next by Date:
RE: Question about yet another bug in Sum
Previous by thread:
Re: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
Next by thread:
Re: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
|