|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg35235] Re: [mg35214] Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at tuins.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 05:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
What do you mean by: "will not evaluate numerically"???
I was going to suggest simply:
Collect[Simplify[fS],x]
but this ought to produce something similar to your last approach, and
since I can't see anything wrong with that I can't tell if the same
problem will not occur with my proposed solution.
Andrzej Kozlowski
Toyama International University
JAPAN
http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/
On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 03:12 PM, AES wrote:
> I have a long expression f that involves integers times various
> powers of symbols b and x, i.e.
>
> f = ratio of two lengthy polynomials in b and x
>
> If I series expand this in x , viz.
>
> fS = Series[f, {x, 0, 2}] // Normal
>
> I get an answer in the form
>
> fS = c1 x + c2 x^2
>
> where the coefficients c1 and c2 in the resulting series expansion
> come out as rather messy expressions (ratios of polynomials). In my
> problem, however, these coefficients actually happen to simplify
> substantially (since there are common factors in their numerators and
> denominators), and I'd like to have them in simplified form. But if I
> write
>
> fS // Simplify
>
> I'm back in lengthy polynomial form; and if I try something like
>
> fS = (Coefficient[fS, x] // Simplify) x +
> (Coefficient[fS, x^2] // Simplify) x^2
>
> I get an expression that looks great, but will not evaluate numerically.
>
> Any easy way around this?
>
>
>
Prev by Date:
RE: Corrupted Files
Next by Date:
Re: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
Previous by thread:
RE: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
Next by thread:
Re: Simplifying the *Individual Coefficients* in Series Expansions?
|