|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Integration
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg44424] Re: Integration
- From: akhmel at hotmail.com (Alex)
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:51:05 -0500 (EST)
- References: <bmg0li$e9k$1@smc.vnet.net> <bmj2os$prs$1@smc.vnet.net> <200311040823.DAA10480@smc.vnet.net> <200311051500.KAA26314@smc.vnet.net> <bofsj3$5ki$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote in message news:<bofsj3$5ki$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Is the difficulty here merely one of time and space, or an incomplete
> implementation in Mathematica? After all, Risch's by-now old algorithm
> determines whether a given elementary function has an elementary
> antiderivative and, if there is one, finds it in finitely many steps.
>
Should we as users of Mathematica demand from Wolfram either retract
his false statement or make Mathematica actually do the job?
Alex
Prev by Date:
Re: differences in Solve with -1/2 and -0.5
Next by Date:
Re: differences in Solve with -1/2 and -0.5
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Integration
Next by thread:
Re: Integration
|