Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2003
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Integration

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg44424] Re: Integration
  • From: akhmel at hotmail.com (Alex)
  • Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:51:05 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <bmg0li$e9k$1@smc.vnet.net> <bmj2os$prs$1@smc.vnet.net> <200311040823.DAA10480@smc.vnet.net> <200311051500.KAA26314@smc.vnet.net> <bofsj3$5ki$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote in message news:<bofsj3$5ki$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Is the difficulty here merely one of time and space, or an incomplete 
> implementation in Mathematica?  After all, Risch's by-now old algorithm 
> determines whether a given elementary function has an elementary 
> antiderivative and, if there is one, finds it in finitely many steps.
> 

Should we as users of Mathematica demand from Wolfram either retract
his false statement or make Mathematica actually do the job?

Alex


  • Prev by Date: Re: differences in Solve with -1/2 and -0.5
  • Next by Date: Re: differences in Solve with -1/2 and -0.5
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: Integration
  • Next by thread: Re: Integration