|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg47580] Re: When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
- From: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:21:26 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <c5dhrd$nqp$1@smc.vnet.net> <c5gg7l$att$1@smc.vnet.net> <c5lfo0$bt2$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Look up == in Help, and you'll find:
"SameQ requires exact correspondence between expressions, except that
it considers Real numbers equal if their difference is less than the
uncertainty of either of them."
N[2/3] == 2/3
N[2/3] === 2/3
True
False
Bobby
Harold.Noffke at wpafb.af.mil (Harold Noffke) wrote in message news:<c5lfo0$bt2$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Bobby:
>
> Thanks for your examples. I thought about them, and found a very
> short one which still bothers me, because the answer is not what I
> expected ...
>
> In[1]:= N[2/3]
>
> Out[1]= 0.666667
>
> In[2]:= N[2/3]==2/3
>
> Out[2]= True
>
> In[3]:= ?==
> lhs == rhs returns True if lhs and rhs are identical.
>
> Regards,
> Harold
Prev by Date:
Re: Alternative to defining 'operator' function?
Next by Date:
Re: Alternative to defining 'operator' function?
Previous by thread:
Re: When Is Precision[ ] $MachinePrecision, And When Is It Not?
Next by thread:
Format Style
|