Re: Optional Alternatives
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg50018] Re: Optional Alternatives
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Universitaet Leipzig
- References: <200408101002.GAA19525@smc.vnet.net> <cfcqsn$45f$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi, f[Optional[x : (_Real | _Rational), 0.0]] := {Head[x], x} ?? Regards Jens Selwyn Hollis wrote: > > Is it possible to require a function argument to match alternative > patterns and be optional at the same time? As a toy example, suppose I > define > > f[x:_Real|_Rational]:= x > > Is there a way make the argument optional with a given default value, > say 0? I've tried this: > > f[Optional[x:_Real|_Rational, 0]]:= x > > and various other combinations with no success. (Of course I could do > this: f[]:= 0, but I'm interested in the more general issue.) > > ----- > Selwyn Hollis > http://www.appliedsymbols.com > (edit reply-to to reply)
- References:
- 50,000th Message
- From: "Steven M. Christensen" <steve@smc.vnet.net>
- 50,000th Message