Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Minors

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg52844] Minors
  • From: "Robert M. Mazo" <mazo at uoregon.edu>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 06:00:05 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: University of Oregon
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

The Minors command gives, as the (i,j) minor af an nxn matrix, what
ordinary mathematical notation calls the (n-i+1,n-j+1) minor .  I know
how to work around this.  It is explained on pg. 1195 of The
Mathematica Book (version 4).  My question here is, why did the
programmers of Mathematica define Minors this unconventional way?
They usually had a good reason for their programming quirks, but I
can't think of a reason for this one.  Can anyone enlighten me?

	Robert Mazo
	mazo at uoregon.edu


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Minors
      • From: Garry Helzer <gah@math.umd.edu>
  • Prev by Date: pdf[d,x] vs. function(x)
  • Next by Date: Re: Remove the higher order terms in series expansion
  • Previous by thread: Re: pdf[d,x] vs. function(x)
  • Next by thread: Re: Minors