|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "Rubbish" integration outputs
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg45732] Re: "Rubbish" integration outputs
- From: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:37:32 -0500 (EST)
- References: <bulomk$8ir$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Solutions given by DSolve sometimes include integrals that cannot be
carried out explicitly by Integrate. Dummy variables with local names
are used in such integrals.
It's ugly, I agree.
Bobby
"Iwonder" <yssual at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bulomk$8ir$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> Hi,
>
> I always find me in troubles when integrating ODE that I think Mathematica
> should be able to do. It's all right for the very simplest, but consider for
> instance the following:
>
> \!\(DSolve[\((x + 2 x\^2 + x\^3)\) \(y'\)[x] + \(x\^2\) \(y''\)[x] == A, y,
> x]\)
>
> 'A' a constant. Well, the problem is that I don't even the clue that
> Mathematica *cannot* integrate it, there is some output with gibberish, like
> K$14646 and the like (those are intermediary variables I guess). So what is
> wrong? Is Mathematica expected to return such outputs?
>
> Cheers.
Prev by Date:
Re: Transpose matrix does not work when MatrixForm is used, why?
Next by Date:
AW: "Rubbish" integration outputs
Previous by thread:
"Rubbish" integration outputs
Next by thread:
Re: "Rubbish" integration outputs
|