Re: Transpose matrix does not work when MatrixForm is used, why?

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg45733] Re: Transpose matrix does not work when MatrixForm is used, why?*From*: drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat)*Date*: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:37:33 -0500 (EST)*References*: <bu0cdt$agi$1@smc.vnet.net> <bu8hup$aou$1@smc.vnet.net> <buloiq$8i4$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I usually don't want large matrices displayed as matrices; there isn't enough room. And often what MatrixQ deems a matrix ISN'T a matrix -- that is, it depends on how I want to think of it. I decide on a case-by-case basis, and that's what Andrzej's code allows me to do. Bobby Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au> wrote in message news:<buloiq$8i4$1 at smc.vnet.net>... > In article <bu8hup$aou$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > drbob at bigfoot.com (Bobby R. Treat) wrote: > > > I doubt that most of us want ALL rectangular lists displayed as matrices. > > Fine -- but which ones don't you want to be displayed as matrices? And > what is the advantage of keeping them as lists of lists? > > Cheers, > Paul