MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: finding explicit rule for series

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg52068] Re: finding explicit rule for series
  • From: David Bailey <dave at>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 01:37:16 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <cmnaup$7vv$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

Uwe Ziegenhagen wrote:
> Hello,
> i have a series of numbers and would like to use Mathematica to find the 
> explicit algorithm in that way:
> n(i)=5342543+n(i-1)....
> I already spent some time with the manual, but didn't find anything.
> Uwe

If your series of numbers is finite (otherwise you would have a formula 
for n[i]) then you are, in effect, trying to fit an arbitrary function 
to a fixed set of points. There will be an infinite number of possible 
solutions to that problem. Maybe I am not understanding your question.

However, you could produce a list of possible solutions with unknown 
parameters (alpha and beta in this case) - e.g. n[i]:=alpha*n[i-1]+beta 
- which would give you a set of simultaneous equations for the 
parameters. If you can fit more than one 'model' then you obviously need 
more points of your sequence.

David Bailey

  • Prev by Date: webMathematica: how to take objects passed into a JSP page and manipulate them in the MSP tags
  • Next by Date: Re: NonlinearFit problem
  • Previous by thread: Re: finding explicit rule for series
  • Next by thread: NonlinearFit problem