|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: UnitStep
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg52338] Re: [mg52326] UnitStep
- From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:32:09 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Because you are asking it to evaluate 0/0. Instead of a replacement Rule, use
Simplify[(1/p) UnitStep[p-1], p<1]
0
Limit[(1/p) UnitStep[p-1], p->0]
0
Bob Hanlon
>
> From: "Blimbaum, Jerry AA R22" <jerry.blimbaum at navy.mil>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Date: 2004/11/23 Tue AM 02:12:45 EST
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg52338] [mg52326] UnitStep
>
> Why does the following give me 'indeterminate, infinite expression
> encountered', etc. instead of zero....
>
>
> (1/p) UnitStep[p-1] /.p->0
>
>
> I defined a function using the UnitStep because p could = 0 and I
> thought this would be the way around that problem.......but didnt work
> the way I expected.....
>
>
> jerry blimbaum
>
>
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Iterator problem.
Next by Date:
Simplify, Condition, Assuming and SetDelayd
Previous by thread:
Re: UnitStep
Next by thread:
Re: UnitStep
|