MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: A way around the limitations of Re[] and Im[]


Carlos Felippa schrieb:

> As you know, Re[expr] and Im[expr] are left unevaluated when expr is
> not numeric.  I had good luck in simple cases with the following
> substitution trick:
>   
>         Real[c_]:=c/.I->0;     Imag[c_]:=(c-Real[c])/.I->1;
> 
> Do you see any problem with these definitions?
> 
Yes.
The very simple example Sqrt[a] fails with your definitions.
ComplexExpand[Sqrt[a], TargetFunctions -> {Re, Im}] gives a correct result.

-- 
Peter Pein, Berlin


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Problem with Maximize and conditions.
  • Next by Date: Reads only part of file
  • Previous by thread: Re: A way around the limitations of Re[] and Im[]
  • Next by thread: Print with limited precision