Re: Pretty print
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg51524] Re: Pretty print
- From: Kaba <none at here.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <cl4tre$8j1$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Bill Rowe wrote: > Yes, try > > f[x] == 2*x//TraditionalForm But this does not define the function.. I can't evaluate f[5] after this. I got a solution in another post. Thanks for a try.