[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Pretty print

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg51524] Re: Pretty print
• From: Kaba <none at here.com>
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <cl4tre$8j1$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Bill Rowe wrote:
> Yes, try
> 
> f[x] == 2*x//TraditionalForm

But this does not define the function.. I can't evaluate f[5] after
this. I got a solution in another post. Thanks for a try.