Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2004
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Use of large memory

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg50438] Re: Use of large memory
  • From: fei.fzhou at gmail.com (Fei)
  • Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 03:36:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <ch6n9s$2ao$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I have been running Mathematica on HP tru64 unix, linux + Xeon, linux
+ Itanium2 and SunOS machines, all with more than 4 GB of memory, but
mathematica cannot handle any matrix larger than 2GB. When one
allocates several smaller matrices with total memory > 2GB,
MemoryUsed[] is negative. This is quite disappointing. Could any
person from Wolfram explain what is happening?

thanks,
Fei

Gerry Flanagan <flanagan at materials-sciences.com> wrote in message news:<ch6n9s$2ao$1 at smc.vnet.net>...
> I was running into memory limits for a large numerical problem in V5.0. The 
> fastest fix (I thought) was to get a large amount of RAM. We purchased a 
> Pentium 4 machine running XP, with 4GB of memory. I built a test function 
> that progressively uses more memory and prints MemoryUsed[]. Every time I 
> get to just under 2GB of memory, I get the out-of-memory error from the 
> kernal. There's nothing else running, and task manager says there's plenty 
> left. Has anyone found some Windows XP tweak that allows Mathematica to use 
> what's available? Would this all work better in Linux?
> 
> Gerry Flanagan


  • Prev by Date: Parallel Toolkit Example
  • Next by Date: Re: Use of large memory
  • Previous by thread: Use of large memory
  • Next by thread: Re: Use of large memory