[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: symbolic quaternionic analysis
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg55658] Re: symbolic quaternionic analysis
*From*: danieldaniel at gmail.com (Daniel Alayon Solarz)
*Date*: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:36:48 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <d20r0d$bad$1@smc.vnet.net> <d2do5t$lit$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
> You have looked at the Quaternions package, Algebra`Quaternions` ?
yes
>
> > 2) I am interested in functional analysis, is Mathematica capable of handle
> > that?
>
> It is extensible. For example, have a look at
>
> http://physics.uwa.edu.au/pub/Mathematica/MathGroup/Quaternions.nb
Thanks for this!
>
> > p[t_, x_, y_, z_] := {t, {x, y, z}}
> > m[p[t1_, x1_, y1_, z1_],
> > p[t2_, x2_, y2_, z2_]] := {t1*t2 - Dot[{x1, y1, z1}, {x2, y2, z2}],
> > t1*{x2, y2, z2} + t2*{x1, y1, z1} + Cross[{x1, y1, z1}, {x2, y2, z2}]}
>
> The result of the multiplication should itself be a quaternion. You are
> returning just a list.
I don't think so, please run the code.
>
> > Pwr[p[t_, x_, y_, z_], 0] := { 1, {0, 0, 0}}
> > Pwr[p[t_, x_, y_, z_], 1] := p[t, x, y, z]
> > Pwr[p[t_, x_, y_, z_], n_] := m[Pwr[p[t, x, y, z], n - 1], p[t, x, y, z]]
>
> Note that de Moivre's identity holds for quaternions. The n-th power of
>
> Quaternion[s, v]
>
> where v = {x,y,z} is
>
> Quaternion[Re[(s + I r)^n], v/r Im[(s + I r)^n]]
I am not too sure that this is faster than my implementation. Is there
any way to objectively compare speed?
>
> where r = Sqrt[v.v]. This result can be used, formally at least, to
> implement analytic functions with real coefficients.
>
> > RFueter[{a_, {b_, c_, d_}}] :=
> > m[D[{a, {b, c, d}}, t], p[1, 0, 0, 0]] +
> > m[D[{a, {b, c, d}}, x], p[0, 1, 0, 0]] +
> > m[D[{a, {b, c, d}}, y], p[0, 0, 1, 0]] +
> > m[D[{a, {b, c, d}}, z], p[0, 0, 0, 1]]
> > LFueter[{a_, {b_, c_, d_}}] :=
> > m[p[1, 0, 0, 0], D[{a, {b, c, d}}, t]] +
> > m[p[0, 1, 0, 0], D[{a, {b, c, d}}, x]] +
> > m[p[0, 0, 1, 0], D[{a, {b, c, d}}, y]] +
> > m[p[0, 0, 0, 1], D[{a, {b, c, d}}, z]]
>
> I am aware of the Cauchy-Riemann-Fueter equations but this does not look
> like a correct implementation of them to me. I also have copies of
> papers by Deavours, Sudbury, and Sweetster that may be of interest to
> you.
This is indeed the Fueter Operator. Sudbery paper is a classic and
very recomendable. Deavours paper is **seriously flawed** and I
encourage anyone interested in this subject to read my paper:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.AP/0412125
Where a genuine generalization of Cauchy-Riemann in 4D is presented.
Regards,
Daniel
Prev by Date:
**Re: Replacing an expression by an expression**
Next by Date:
**Fwd: Replacing an expression by an expression**
Previous by thread:
**Re: symbolic quaternionic analysis**
Next by thread:
**NDSolve errors with DAE**
| |