Re: Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg55821] Re: [mg55784] Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
- From: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:10:00 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200504030951.FAA15764@smc.vnet.net> <d2tfeu$qm1$1@smc.vnet.net> <200504060711.DAA13558@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
I dunno. I kinda like multiple list plot. I am also a fan of the epilog option. That said, there is definitely a point (or interval?) where the standard plotting methods become a bottleneck. On Apr 6, 2005 3:11 AM, AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote: > > > konstantpi at mail15.com wrote: > > > i have a trouble with MultipleListPlot > > Forget about MultipleListPlot and having to learn its convoluted and > confining syntax and requirements. Instead, learn to use > > Needs["Graphics`Graphics`"]; > DisplayTogether[ . . . . . . . . ] > > and you can easily shape whatever you want, and understand what you're > doing. > > -- Chris Chiasson Kettering University Mechanical Engineering Graduate Student 1 810 265 3161
- References:
- MultipleListPlot Prolem
- From: konstantpi@mail15.com
- Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
- From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
- MultipleListPlot Prolem