[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg55821] Re: [mg55784] Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
• From: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:10:00 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200504030951.FAA15764@smc.vnet.net> <d2tfeu$qm1$1@smc.vnet.net> <200504060711.DAA13558@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

I dunno. I kinda like multiple list plot. I am also a fan of the
epilog option. That said, there is definitely a point (or interval?)
where the standard plotting methods become a bottleneck.

On Apr 6, 2005 3:11 AM, AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote:
> 
> > konstantpi at mail15.com wrote:
> > > i have a trouble with MultipleListPlot
> 
> Forget about MultipleListPlot and having to learn its convoluted and
> confining syntax and requirements.   Instead, learn to use
> 
>    Needs["Graphics`Graphics`"];
>    DisplayTogether[ . . . . . . . . ]
> 
> and you can easily shape whatever you want, and understand what you're
> doing.
> 
> 


-- 
Chris Chiasson
Kettering University
Mechanical Engineering
Graduate Student
1 810 265 3161

• References:
  • MultipleListPlot Prolem
    • From: konstantpi@mail15.com
  • Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
    • From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>