Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg55814] Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
  • From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <d3041u$ndm$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi Matt,
Mathematica gives a direction. I makes sense to specify a direction by a 
unit vector (length==1);
Sincerely, Daniel

Matt wrote:
> Hello,
>   This isn't particularly important probably, however, I am trying to
> learn as much about Mathematica as possible, and I thought this might
> shed some light on a 'Why Mathematica does this or that' principle.
> 
>   I'm working my way through 'The Mathematica Guidebook for
> Programming' and on page 177, he gives an example as follows:
> 
> In[39]:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I] DirectedInfinity[I]
> Out[39]:= DirectedInfinity[-(1 - I)/sqrt(2)]
> 
> That puzzled me a bit, so I decided to see what Mathematica would do
> with just the first part:
> 
> In[40]:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I]
> Out[40]:= DirectedInfinity[(1 + I)/sqrt(2)]
> 
> I realize that (1 + I)/sqrt(2) is in the same direction as (1 + I), but
> why did Mathematica change it to the more 'strange' form?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
  • Next by Date: Re: Recommendations for a programming book?
  • Previous by thread: Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
  • Next by thread: Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?