       Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg55814] Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
• From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
• Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <d3041u\$ndm\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Hi Matt,
Mathematica gives a direction. I makes sense to specify a direction by a
unit vector (length==1);
Sincerely, Daniel

Matt wrote:
> Hello,
>   This isn't particularly important probably, however, I am trying to
> learn as much about Mathematica as possible, and I thought this might
> shed some light on a 'Why Mathematica does this or that' principle.
>
>   I'm working my way through 'The Mathematica Guidebook for
> Programming' and on page 177, he gives an example as follows:
>
> In:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I] DirectedInfinity[I]
> Out:= DirectedInfinity[-(1 - I)/sqrt(2)]
>
> That puzzled me a bit, so I decided to see what Mathematica would do
> with just the first part:
>
> In:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I]
> Out:= DirectedInfinity[(1 + I)/sqrt(2)]
>
> I realize that (1 + I)/sqrt(2) is in the same direction as (1 + I), but
> why did Mathematica change it to the more 'strange' form?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: MultipleListPlot Prolem
• Next by Date: Re: Recommendations for a programming book?
• Previous by thread: Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
• Next by thread: Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?