MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Types in Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg62879] Re: [mg62805] Re: Types in Mathematica
  • From: Ed Peschko <esp5 at>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:12:23 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <dlp2ci$le$> <> <dls4vp$mmc$> <dm1ak3$i1n$> <dmjrb8$5u6$> <dmm2tp$nmo$> <dmrt6i$6le$> <> <dmui9j$ml5$> <>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:41:14PM -0500, Paul Abbott wrote:
> In article <dmui9j$ml5$1 at>,
>  Sseziwa Mukasa <mukasa at> wrote:
> > The ever contrarian Larry Wall of course decided that Perl, the 
> > sin qua non of weak typing, would attempt to resolve that ambiguity.  
> > The low regard with which Perl programmers are generally held in the 
> > Computer Science community, a special circle of hell previously reserved 
> > for Visual Basic users, is a by product of that fact.

That 'special circle of hell' that you speak of is news to me. I've never 
heard of it; I know that perl has its detractors, but for every detractor, there's 
a fervent supporter on communities like slashdot ( and
digg (

As for an impression of mathematica users, I've never seen one (positive or negative).
Mathematica seems to be off this particular map.

As for weak typing, its not necessarily a bad thing - its a damn *productive* thing 
in the case of perl. That being said, optional, strong(er) typing wouldn't be that
bad an item to have. Perl6 is adding this, but its a long, slow slog; perl6 isn't expected
to be out for a couple of years, at the minimum.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica thread
  • Previous by thread: Re: Types in Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica