Re: Re: Re: Roman Maeder's Classes.m
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg62978] Re: [mg62954] Re: [mg62885] Re: [mg62857] Roman Maeder's Classes.m
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 06:02:48 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200512070410.XAA23737@smc.vnet.net> <200512080504.AAA11608@smc.vnet.net> <926c8d70512080926l4f55182ayda9199ccf428c70b@mail.gmail.com> <200512091010.FAA05444@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 9 Dec 2005, at 19:10, Kristen W Carlson wrote: > Or we could ask Andrzej to explain briefly his comments: "slightest > liking for > this [Maeder] approach and I prefer the Combinatorica package by far". > This implies that oop is implemented in a superior way in > Combinatorica? No, that means I do not much like the whole idea of using OOP in Mathematica. I guess the main reason is that I find this style of programming so alien to the way I usually program in Mathematica that I can never remember how anything works and always have to read the documentation from scratch. Of course I do not have such problems with the Combinatorica package, which is why I have always been using it in teaching Graph Theory and never was tempted to use Gray's approach based on Maeder's classes. Andrzej Kozlowski
- References:
- Roman Maeder's Classes.m
- From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@globalsymmetry.com>
- Re: Roman Maeder's Classes.m
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: Roman Maeder's Classes.m
- From: Kristen W Carlson <carlsonkw@gmail.com>
- Roman Maeder's Classes.m