[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is Apart[ .. ] the correct way for denominator splitting?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg58555] Re: Is Apart[ .. ] the correct way for denominator splitting?
*From*: "Steve Luttrell" <steve_usenet at _removemefirst_luttrell.org.uk>
*Date*: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 05:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <dag0hm$5a6$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Factor[2/(2x^2 - 1), Extension -> Sqrt[2]] // Apart
gives
-(Sqrt[2]/(Sqrt[2] - 2*x)) - Sqrt[2]/(Sqrt[2] + 2*x)
Steve Luttrell
"Jos Bergervoet" <Jos.MyName at Philips.com> wrote in message
news:dag0hm$5a6$1 at smc.vnet.net...
>
> When I ask for: Apart[2/(x^2-1), x] I nicely get:
>
> 1/(x-1) - 1/(x+1)
>
> But unfortunately Apart[2/(2x^2-1), x] does not give the same
> splitting of the denominator ( it just gives back 2/(2x^2-1) ).
>
> What is the correct way to see the denominator splitting with all
> terms first order (as one would use for integration, etc.)
>
> I found Andrzej Kozlowski's answer in message
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.math/msg/4c9741832668c3b7
> from 2001, but I was wondering whether in the mean time a built-in
> function might have been added?
>
> -- Jos
> .
>
Prev by Date:
**Don't understand behaviour of Solve[]**
Next by Date:
**Re: Urgent**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Is Apart[ .. ] the correct way for denominator splitting?**
Next by thread:
**Simplify and FullSimplify**
| |