Problems with my first package: Statistics`Common`RegressionCommon`BestFitParameters instead of BestFitParameters

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg58049] Problems with my first package: Statistics`Common`RegressionCommon`BestFitParameters instead of BestFitParameters*From*: frank <frank at kuesterei.ch>*Date*: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:18:49 -0400 (EDT)*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hello, thanks to some hints I got on this list, I have managed to write my first package. There was one problem with options, but I solved this with the help of the list archive: It wouldn't accept {verbosity->0} because it is something different than Schulerstuff`ConstrainedFit`Private`verbosity. But with the help of http://forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/1994/Apr/msg00041.html and a verbosity::usage="foo"; this works now. However, there remains one problem. Within a function in the package that is exported, I do ExportedFunction[whatever_,options___]:=Block[{...}, ... RegressResult=NonlinearRegress[...] ... Return[Switch[verbosity /. {options}, 0, BestFitParameters /. RegressResult, 1, {NMinResultReport, RegressResult} ]]; ] With verbosity->0, everything is fine now, but with 1 I get: ... Statistics`Common`RegressionCommon`BestFitParameters -> {a -> 0.500455, b -> 0.999833}, ... where I expected simply BestFitParameters -> {a -> 0.500455, b -> 0.999833}, Can you tell me, without me creating a minimal example, what I can do to simplify the Return value? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Problems with my first package: Statistics`Common`RegressionCommon`BestFitParameters instead of BestFitParameters***From:*Mathematica Ezine <ezine@omegaconsultinggroup.com>