|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: letrec/named let
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg56867] Re: [mg56848] Re: letrec/named let
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 02:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200505071935.PAA26955@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 8 May 2005, at 04:35, Bill Rowe wrote:
>
> Interesting. These results seem very dependent on platform.
> Specifically, when I run the code above I get.
Seems more likely that Ordering was broken in 5.1.1.
Andrzej Kozlowski
Prev by Date:
Re: NSum: badly missed Option
Next by Date:
Re: Re: letrec/named let
Previous by thread:
Re: letrec/named let
Next by thread:
Re: Re: letrec/named let
|