MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: letrec/named let


On 8 May 2005, at 04:35, Bill Rowe wrote:
>
> Interesting. These results seem very dependent on platform. 
> Specifically, when I run the code above I get.

Seems more likely that Ordering was broken in 5.1.1.

Andrzej Kozlowski


  • Prev by Date: Re: NSum: badly missed Option
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: letrec/named let
  • Previous by thread: Re: letrec/named let
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: letrec/named let