Re: Re: letrec/named let
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg56869] Re: [mg56848] Re: letrec/named let
- From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 02:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200505071935.PAA26955@smc.vnet.net> <fbd54b601bfad908933f1bfc858f0308@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
> Seems more likely that Ordering was broken in 5.1.1. I suppose it does, at that. Bobby On Sun, 8 May 2005 11:35:58 +0900, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > On 8 May 2005, at 04:35, Bill Rowe wrote: >> >> Interesting. These results seem very dependent on platform. >> Specifically, when I run the code above I get. > > Seems more likely that Ordering was broken in 5.1.1. > > Andrzej Kozlowski > > > > -- DrBob at bigfoot.com
- References:
- Re: letrec/named let
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv@earthlink.net>
- Re: letrec/named let