MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: letrec/named let


On 5/7/05 at 10:19 PM, drbob at bigfoot.com (DrBob) wrote:

>> Seems more likely that Ordering was broken in 5.1.1.

>I suppose it does, at that.

From my perspective, this doesn't seem more likely since I am using version 5.1.1. Or at least what was purported to be version 5.1.1. I did note at the time I downloaded this version and installed it, the string returned by $Version shows the version to be 5.1 with a more recent date than before. 
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: letrec/named let
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: letrec/named let
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: letrec/named let
  • Next by thread: Cases and Nonatomic expression