Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Use of Mathematica with Rule-based Equation Derivations

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg61914] Use of Mathematica with Rule-based Equation Derivations
  • From: mmorriss at gcn.ou.edu
  • Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 05:11:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi All - I'm a many-year user of mathematica, but have always had one
particular problem with it that I may have just simply missed reading
about.

Mathematica Version: 5.2

Problem: I would like to develop a set of re-rewite rules to apply to the
Expected Value operator.  For example:

E[a x] = a E[x]  a -> constant, x -> variable
E[b + f[x]] = b + E[f[x]] , etc.

The issue is how does one using Mathematica distinguish a 'constant
variable (i.e. a and b)' from a variable 'variable' (i.e. 'x')? The head
of a, b and x is 'Symbol' and neither a, b nor x contain a number so I
can't use a_?NumberQ to identify it as a constant.

This actually goes to the wider question of how does one use Mathematica
for symbolic derviations where numbers are not actually substituted in the
derviation?

E.g. E[a + E[b x]] /. Rule2
   out= a + b E[x] etc.

Thanks all - Mark Morrissey
University of Oklahoma



  • Prev by Date: MiniMaxApproximation question
  • Next by Date: Re: A Problem with Integrate
  • Previous by thread: Re: MiniMaxApproximation question
  • Next by thread: Re: Use of Mathematica with Rule-based Equation Derivations