MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Types in Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg62218] Re: Types in Mathematica
  • From: David Bailey <dave at>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 02:28:21 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <> <> <dl8s4g$n41$> <dl980q$r2a$> <> <dlc96b$m81$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

I agree with Andrzej that that the hybrid nature of the Mathematica 
language is a great strength. It offers programmers (not all of whom are 
expert with Mathematica) a fall-back way to implement operations that 
they can't see how to do in a functional way. Often the loss of 
efficiency is not relevant in their application.

Furthermore, when you use a language that follow a single paradigm (e.g. 
Java) there are always ideas that don't fit the paradigm and end up 
being implemented in a clumsy, confusing way - e.g. Java event 
processing (IMHO).

David Bailey

  • Prev by Date: Re: Plotting polyhedra
  • Next by Date: Timing?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Types in Mathematica