|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Package development
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg62630] Re: Re: Package development
- From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:06:06 -0500 (EST)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
And I forgot to say that my ASCII text editor has syntax coloring for
Mathematica *and* can find matching brackets and so it is mutch more
helpfull than the FrontEnd.
Regards
Jens
"Gerry Flanagan" <flanagan at materials-sciences.com>
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:dmh919$8r1$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| I'm surprised by the number of people that say
they develop packages
| using the notebook interface as an editor. About
once a year I give that
| a try and decide its hopeless. I'm a big fan of
using line-breaks, tabs,
| and other pretty-print tricks to add some
clarity to the functions. The
| automated features in the notebook are clever,
but not good enough for
| something I want to release within the company.
So I end up with
| developmental notebooks that feed (copy/paste) a
text .m file over time.
| BTW, I like a product called UltraEdit for my
programming. It allows me
| to set up a file of Mathematica keywords so that
I can use color syntax
| highlighting while editing.
| Gerry F.
|
| >On 11/27/05 at 2:41 AM, tt at tt.com wrote:
| >
| >
| >
| >>Now the question. I have written a few
packages in the past. More
| >>recently, I am always questioning myself to
know if I should
| >>develop it directly in an ASCII .m file or use
the notebook format
| >>and rely on the autosave package feature
(initialization cells). I
| >>like the idea of developing the package in
the notebook format to
| >>have all the formatting features that ease
reading, but at the same
| >>time, I hate to loose all the comments I put
in when the *.m file
| >>is created. Of course I could put comments in
the input lines of
| >>the notebook, but then I am better writing the
ASCII file. Also, I
| >>could save the notebook as a package through
"Save as Special"
| >>(that puts all the headers and text in
comments, which is not done
| >>with the autosave package feature), but this
is not an automated
| >>way of doing things. I am just seeking
opinions from Mathematica
| >>power users. Which way do you develop
packages?
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
Prev by Date:
Re: storage, compatibility and HP98xx
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Package development
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Package development
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Package development
|