|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: The question of equality,...
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg60494] Re: The question of equality,...
- From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 9/17/05 at 2:32 AM, terryisnow at yahoo.com wrote:
>Ok I thought I understood this stuff but maybe not,...
>If I wanted to check for bit-for-bit equality of two arbitrary
>precision numbers (without regard to how many of those digits are
>meaningful) like the way it would be done using the "==" operator
>in C, then neither "==" nor "===" will do the job, is that correct?
Yes
>So what can I use then?
In[1]:=
x = 1. + 10^(-$MachinePrecision);
In[2]:=
x == 1.
Out[2]=
True
In[3]:=
x === 1.
Out[3]=
True
In[4]:=
RealDigits[x, 2] == RealDigits[1., 2]
Out[4]=
False
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four
Prev by Date:
Visualization Site - Updates
Next by Date:
another Bug in Reduce ?
Previous by thread:
The question of equality,...
Next by thread:
Re: The question of equality,...
|