Re: Re: Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg71918] Re: [mg71901] [mg69704] Re: [mg69668] Re: [mg69655] General--Mathematica and Subversion
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 06:38:43 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200612031126.GAA08070@smc.vnet.net>
Subversion is really nice. On Gentoo, it has a fairly easy repository install - probably true on other distros as well. For some reason, Workbench seems faster than regular Eclipse - even with "the same" plugins installed (I imagine Eclipse comes with a lot of stuff that is taken out of Workbench, but I would be hard pressed to name what it is). On 12/3/06, Owen, HL (Hywel) <h.l.owen at dl.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I thought Workbench was designed to work with Subversion, rather than > >> replace it?? > > > >As said, I haven't tested Wolfram's Workbench. > > > >It is quite possible that Workbench uses subversion as version control > >backend, but it might use another system, or make it an option. > > > >Subversion itself uses two different backends (BerkeleyDB and FSFS > since 2004) > >leading to architectural choices when implementing what might be > considered > >as a service. > > > >Since Workbench is Eclipse-based, you must somehow realize the high > degree of > >modularity for this kind of software application. > > > >jmt > > We have started to use Workbench for our software development. Workbench > includes CVS support out-of-the-box. Subversion support requires you to > use a plugin - we use Subclipse, which works really well. > http://subclipse.tigris.org/ > (Remember that Workbench is basically Eclipse with a Wolfram wrapper > around it - all the Eclipse plugins should work in Workbench). > > I can send round some documentation if anyone wants it. > > H > > > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- Re: Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion
- From: "Owen, HL \(Hywel\)" <h.l.owen@dl.ac.uk>
- Re: Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion