|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg72091] Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
- From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:55:27 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
- References: <elglnb$h7f$1@smc.vnet.net>
Steven Shippee wrote:
> What is happening here:
>
> Sin[30*Degree]
> Sin[31*Degree]
> Sin[29*Degree]
> which makes it appear that only the first line of input works?
>
> However, if I do something like:
>
> \!\(Sin[\(29*Pi\)\/180. ]\)
>
> I get the expected result ... I'm sure it is me, what am I missing in that I
> think I am not seeing consistent behavior?
Exact vs. approximate results.
In[1]:=
Sin[30*Degree]
Sin[31*Degree]
Sin[29*Degree]
Out[1]=
1/2
Out[2]=
Sin[31*Degree]
Out[3]=
Sin[29*Degree]
In[4]:=
N[%%]
Out[4]=
0.5150380749100542
In[5]:=
N[%%]
Out[5]=
0.48480962024633706
Regards,
Jean-Marc
Prev by Date:
Re: RE: FullSimplify and HypergeometricPFQ
Next by Date:
Re: RE: FullSimplify and HypergeometricPFQ
Previous by thread:
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
Next by thread:
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
|