|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg72079] RE: [mg72057] Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:54:55 -0500 (EST)
Steven,
Because Mathematica returns exact results and it has no further
simplifications for 29 and 31 Degree. Use N if you want approximate number
results.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Steven Shippee [mailto:slshippee at comcast.net]
What is happening here:
Sin[30*Degree]
Sin[31*Degree]
Sin[29*Degree]
which makes it appear that only the first line of input works?
However, if I do something like:
\!\(Sin[\(29*Pi\)\/180. ]\)
I get the expected result ... I'm sure it is me, what am I missing in that I
think I am not seeing consistent behavior?
Thanks in advance,
Steven Shippee
slshippee at comcast.net
Prev by Date:
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
Next by Date:
Slow Help Browser
Previous by thread:
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
Next by thread:
Re: Sin[30*Degree] vs Sin[29*Degree]
|