REPOSTING:RE: REPOSTING: PowerTower extended to real exponents

*To*: <mathgroup at smc.vnet.net>*Subject*: [mg72200] REPOSTING:RE: [mg72033] REPOSTING: PowerTower extended to real exponents*From*: "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>*Date*: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:49:22 -0500 (EST)

And then silence... I have extended the code to cover x > 1 for PowerTower[x,n], with some mathematical problems slightly above x = Exp[1/E] = 1.444667861009766. Since the code has grown (800 kB), I do not attach it here. You are welcome to download it from http://web.telia.com/~u31815170/Mathematica/ I would be grateful if someone could check if my calculations make sense or are nonsense. I have difficulties to find out the relevance of this, if it is important or not. It is of course important for me, because I do this at hobby work, and want to know if I should apply for means to proceed professionally with this. From http://forum.wolframscience.com/archive/topic/956-1.html: "Please also note that tetration is used in the proposed RRHC number notation hyper-format (s=4) and that any positive real number can be represented as p*(b#n), with this format. Number p (with 0 < p < b), the super-exponent extension, can be found by iteratively applying n times the log b operator, until p < b. In other words, it is not indispensable to solve the problem of extending tetration to the reals (which has a great theoretical importance), before using the RRHC number notation format. The extension of tetration to the reals is tightly connected with the analytic continuation of operators, as performed, for instance, within the "Fractional Calculus". A solution is probably . around the corner." From http://wiki.tetration.org/index.php?title=Main_Page: "Extending Tetration Many people are interested in extending tetration from the natural numbers to the real and complex numbers. Ioannis Galidakis (http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/math/) even has an artcle scheduled for publication that extends research of tetration into the realm of quaternions. Ioannis also has a considerable amount of information about tetration on his website. His growing list of publications shows not only that tetration in finally a valid field of mathematics research in its own right, but that it is an active and vital area of research. Andrew Robbins (http://wiki.tetration.org/index.php?) is also doing serious work on tetration and has his own tetration web site (http://tetration.itgo.com/). This site is currently primarily Daniel's work although it does now have Andrew Robbins' Super-logarithm entry (http://wiki.tetration.org/index.php?title=Super-logarithm). From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetration: "At this time there is no commonly accepted solution to the general problem of extending tetration to the real or complex numbers, although it is an active area of research." Further on this page PowerTower[10,0.99] is estimated to 9.77 and PowerTower[10,1.01] to 10.55, while I obtain PowerTower[10,0.99] = 9.62145617690982427469 and PowerTower[10,1.01] = 10.4004278027106549883 Best regards Ingolf Dahl ingolf.dahl at telia.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Ingolf Dahl [mailto:ingolf.dahl at telia.com] > Sent: den 9 december 2006 12:10 > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Subject: [mg72033] REPOSTING: PowerTower extended to real exponents > > I am reposting this (probably lost mail due to some problems > with our mailserver), with some small corrections in the > definition of PowerTower: > > This is a continuation of the thread [mg71764] Functional > decomposition (solving f[f[x]] = g[x] for given g), but I > wanted a new title. > > The function PowerTower gives x to the power x to the power x > ... n times, and is in the Mathematica Help (for Power) defined as > > PowerTower[(x_)?NumericQ, (n_Integer)?Positive] := Nest[x^#1 > & , x, n - 1] > > This operation is also known as tetration (good Google search > word), iterated exponentials and hyperpowers. > > I have extended the definition of PowerTower to cover values > Log[x] > 0.55 and real values of n >= -2. (Smaller values of > x demand a slightly different algorithm, which has not been > coded yet.) > > Some results from this morning: > > e tetrated to pi: > > Timing[PowerTower[N[E, 50], N[Pi, 50]]] > > {2.4530000000000003*Second, > 3.7150463906547139171107134916520886913907197951098502328119`4 > 6.532680501112 > 68*^10} > > pi tetrated to e: > > Timing[PowerTower[N[Pi, 50], N[E, 50]]] > {2.625000000000001*Second, > 1.885451906681809677772360465630708697760585825573061664`36.29 > 506406979924*^ > 6} > > 10 tetrated to 2.390797847503886227: > > Timing[PowerTower[10., 2.390797847503886227`18.378542856155452]] > {0.516*Second, 1.0000000000003806*^100} > > 2 tetrated to 0.5: > > Timing[PowerTower[SetAccuracy[2, 50], 0.5]] > {0.031000000000000583*Second, > 1.458798141958706268157503723664793362303661625817509512716`47 > .9503312794002 > 24} > > Code is below. > Best regards > > Ingolf Dahl > ingolf.dahl at telia.com (snipped, download code from http://web.telia.com/~u31815170/Mathematica/)