MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Any simple way to flatten all but the bottom level?


Is there any reason the first ordinate is at a different level of
nesting than all the others? Was that a typo? If it was, you can solve
the problem by mapping Sequence onto the result of the Nest command.

dontdont at gmail.com wrote:
> Am I overlooking something I should be able to see?
>
> When I Nest Table I sometimes produce things like this
>
> {{0, 0, 0}, {{0, 0, 13}, {0, 1, 9}, {0, 2, 5}, {0, 3, 1}}, {{1, 0, 4},
> {1, 1, 0}}}
>
> where each triple is actually one solution I'm looking for.
> But I don't see a simple way to transform this result into
>
> {{0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 13}, {0, 1, 9}, {0, 2, 5}, {0, 3, 1}, {1, 0, 4}, {1,
> 1, 0}}
>
> I would have guessed there would be a way to coax Flatten to do this.
>
> Thus far I haven't found what looks like a good method.
> I have found a few awkward and bad ways but no simple clean way.
> 
> Would anyone enlighten me?
> 
> thanks


  • Prev by Date: Re: Any simple way to flatten all but the bottom level?
  • Next by Date: elasticity
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any simple way to flatten all but the bottom level?
  • Next by thread: Re: Any simple way to flatten all but the bottom level?