|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
fizzy wrote:
>Can someone explain why AMD does so well on this test and Pentium does so
>poorly by comparison??
>I am planning to buy a new computer and these tests seem to indicate that a
>Mathematica user should buy an AMD machine.
>
>thanks....Jerry Blimbaum
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "karl unterkofler" <karl.unterkofler at fhv.at>
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
>Subject: [mg64318] [mg64299] [mg64287] Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
>
>
>
>
>>''Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers''
>>is now on <a href="http://smc.vnet.net/mathbench.html">
>>(or <a href="http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/mma.html">)
>>
>>
>>Mathematica 5.x benchmark on
>>http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/timings50.html
>>
>>New results for Mathematica 5.x:
>>
>>Pentium 4 XT ("Extreme Edition"), 3.2 GHz, 2GB, Win XP Pro
>>Pentium 4 3.2 GHz 1 GB RAM, Win XP Pro
>>Athlon Tunderbird, 1.2 GHz, 1GB, Windows 2K, SP 4
>>3.0GHz Pentium IV, 512MB RAM, Windows XP Pro SP2
>>Powermac G5 dual 2.3GHz, 2GB, MacOSX 10.4.2 <br>
>>AMD Sempron 2400+, @ 1.667 GHz, 256 MB, Madrake Linux 10.1
>>HP Compaq dc7100, Intel 3.2Ghz, Windows XP Pro
>>iBook G4 1.42GHZ, 512MB RAM, OSX 10.4.2
>>3.0GHz Pentium IV, 512MB RAM, Windows XP Pro SP2
>>Sun Ultra 40 (TM) Workstation, 2xOpteron 254, 2.8 GHz, Sun Solaris x86 (64
>>bit)
>>
>>
>>The test notebook for Mathematica 5.x is available at
>>http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/math/MMA5.0-Test.nb
>>
>>
>>Karl Unterkofler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Have you tried the inbuilt benchmarking function
<<Utilities`Benchmark`
BenchmarkReport[ ]
I get Athlon643200+ with SuSE Linux Desktop9 seems to be best
Hope this helps
Prev by Date:
Re: Using sockets for "downloader" application in Mathematica
Next by Date:
Re: Strange Syntax problem
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
Next by thread:
Re: Comparison of Mathematica on Various Computers
|