|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Limit Question
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg66479] Re: [mg66459] Re: [mg66452] Limit Question
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
And yes, the Mathematica Help for Limit DOES now say that Assumptions is an
option - but it is interesting that almost everyone missed that and use the
Assuming statement instead. And wondered why it worked!
I guess it pays to read the Help carefully for newer features, such Assuming
and $Assumptions.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Carl K. Woll [mailto:carlw at wolfram.com]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Blimbaum, Jerry CIV NSWC PC wrote:
> Why do these give no output?
>
> Simplify[Limit[Exp[-a t],t->Infinity],a>0]
>
> and same for
>
> Simplify[Limit[Exp[a t],t->Infinity],a<0]
>
> thanks...
>
> Jerry Blimbaum
>
>
Try sticking the assumption inside of Limit:
In[11]:= Limit[Exp[-a t], t -> Infinity, Assumptions -> a > 0]
Out[11]= 0
In[12]:= Limit[Exp[a t], t -> Infinity, Assumptions -> a < 0]
Out[12]= 0
Carl Woll
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
Re: A Mathematica crash under MacOS
Next by Date:
Re: Re: level curve selection
Previous by thread:
Re: Limit Question
Next by thread:
level curve selection
|