|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Infinity vs DirectedInfinity[1]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70538] Re: [mg70489] Infinity vs DirectedInfinity[1]
- From: Carl Woll <carlw at wolfram.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200610180816.EAA07979@smc.vnet.net>
Chris Chiasson wrote:
>Infinity is a symbol, as far as I know. However, in FullForm it is
>shown as the equivalent DirectedInfinity[1].
>
>Is there some kind of MakeBoxes rule for FullForm that makes Infinity
>show up that way?
>
>
>
Actually, when evaluated, Infinity is converted to DirectedInfinity[1].
This is like when I is converted to Complex[0,1]. Compare:
FullForm[Hold[Infinity]]
Hold[Infinity]
and
FullForm[Infinity]
DirectedInfinity[1]
On the other hand, DirectedInfinity[d] has formatting rules for
InputForm, StandardForm and TraditionalForm that cause it to be
displayed as Sign[d] Infinity when d is +/-1 or +/-I.
Carl Woll
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: attention 64 bit Mathematica users - would you please test a command for me?
Next by Date:
Re: Dimensional analysis package
Previous by thread:
Infinity vs DirectedInfinity[1]
Next by thread:
Re: Infinity vs DirectedInfinity[1]
|