Re: "short circuiting" And and Or
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70635] Re: [mg70582] "short circuiting" And and Or
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:14:53 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200610200921.FAA11062@smc.vnet.net>
condition /@ (And @@ list) If the objects in your list will not react to being contained inside an And, apply it first and then map the condition onto it. Otherwise, use Catch, Scan, and Throw On 10/20/06, Szabolcs Horvat <szhorvat at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to write a function that tests whether there are any elements > in a list that violate a certain condition. I could simply use > And@@condition/@list, but for reasons of efficiency I'd like to stop > the testing as soon as a "False" value is found. Is there any elegant > way of doing this without writing an explicit While loop? > > Szabolcs Horvát > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- "short circuiting" And and Or
- From: "Szabolcs Horvat" <szhorvat@gmail.com>
- "short circuiting" And and Or