Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70716] Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- From: Helen Read <hpr at together.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:24:24 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: HPR <read at math.uvm.edu>
Will Robertson wrote:
> Will Robertson wrote:
>>If it's simply personal preference, what do you like to use?
> Thanks all, much food for thought.
> It seems pretty clear that most people prefer the shorthands.
Interesting. I don't use it myself, and find it quite difficult to read.
> I think I'm now of the opinion that if I was beginner enough in
> Mathematica, and I forgot what /@ meant after 6 months, I'd also forget
> how Map worked; so the advantages in simplifying the code by using
> the shorthand methods (both for reading and writing) outweigh any
> advantage of the verbosity of the named functions.
I teach calculus students to use Mathematica, and I don't show them the
shorthand with the @ and so forth. I far prefer the Function notation
University of Vermont
Prev by Date:
Solve with dot products
Next by Date:
Re: two questions
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
Next by thread: