MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Solve with dot products

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg70723] Solve with dot products
  • From: Oliver Friedrich <xoliver.friedrich at tzm.dex>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:24:43 -0400 (EDT)


I have some difficulties with interpretation of a solution that Solve 


From In[2]:=
Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions 
may \
not be found.


When I do that equation by hand I get something that I can't put into 
correspondence with the solution above.

* means Inverse of a

a.b.c=d    	    	    	|(_)*

c*.b*.a*=d*    	    	|c.

b*.a*=c.d*    	    	|b.

a*=b.c.d*    	    	|(_)*


b and c are swapped compared to the Mathematica solution.

1) Where's my error?
2) What's the interpretation of such an InverseFunction expression, I 
don't get along the docu.
3) What's the z in InverseFunction[x,y,z][args] good for when I could 
count the number of arguments in args?

Thanks a lot for your help


Oliver Friedrich

My email has no x!

  • Prev by Date: Re: Inserting hyperlinks which carry over to PDF?
  • Next by Date: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
  • Previous by thread: Re: Inserting hyperlinks which carry over to PDF?
  • Next by thread: Re: Solve with dot products