|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg69784] Re: [mg69732] Re: [mg69656] Re: Why is the negative root?
- From: János <janos.lobb at yale.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:44:09 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200609220503.BAA16334@smc.vnet.net>
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>
> On 20 Sep 2006, at 20:21, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> The key word is "root isolation".
>
> As has been, quite rightly, pointed out that's clearly two words.
> Since I think I can still count to 2 without help from Mathematica
> (but clearly not much more since recently I got completely stuck
> trying to add a 10% tip to a restaurant bill
Hmm... 10%... That is not bad. In the States it is minimum 15%.
Can you imagine how harder our brain must work ? Now I know why did
I /subconsciously/ avoid restaurants in recent years :)
János
-----------------------------------------
With dark magic, evil-looking sacrificial knives and scantily clad
virgins under pale moonlight.
http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#What_is_CPAN
Prev by Date:
Re: Suggestions for translating a Do[] loop ...
Next by Date:
Table command strange output when 'i' over 16
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Why is the negative root?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Why is the negative root?
|