Re: Performance comparison Mac OSX vs. Windows XP
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg69954] Re: [mg69925] Performance comparison Mac OSX vs. Windows XP
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200609271005.GAA00253@smc.vnet.net>
It would be relevant to know if your MacBook had a PowerPC chip in it or an Intel Core/2 Duo/Solo. On 9/27/06, Blackadder <Malte at t-online.de> wrote: > Dear NG, > > recently I switched from a Dell notebook to a MacBook Pro. We licensed > Mathematica 5.2.2.0, which is a Universal Binary on Mac OSX. Yesterday, > a colleague sent me a notebook with some intensive computations and > asked me to test the speed on my MacBook. > > The results were quite surprising and earned me quite a few smirks from > my fellow coworkers. Here's what I got: > > Dell Latitude 505 (1.6 Ghz, 512 MB RAM): 263.44 secs > > MacBook Pro 17" (2.1 Ghz, 2 GB RAM): 402,18 secs > > > This means that my MacBook is about 35 % slower than a technically > inferior Windows notebook. Does anybody have experiences with the > performance of Mathematica on different OSes? Has anybody notices > similar behavior between the Windows and Mac OS versions? Any hints or > comments are very welcome. > > Kind regards, Malte > > > p.s.: If you are interested in running the Mathematica notebook on your > Mac, I'm happy to send you a copy by e-mail. > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- Performance comparison Mac OSX vs. Windows XP
- From: "Blackadder" <Malte@t-online.de>
- Performance comparison Mac OSX vs. Windows XP