Re: Re: Re: strange behavior of Integrate

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg75360] Re: [mg75322] Re: [mg75302] Re: strange behavior of Integrate*From*: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>*Date*: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:35:57 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200704220910.FAA20220@smc.vnet.net><f0hv8o$acb$1@smc.vnet.net> <200704240728.DAA27565@smc.vnet.net> <200704250935.FAA27132@smc.vnet.net>

I don't like to reply to myself but I got careless in my sentence placement yesterday. Daniel Lichtblau wrote: > [...] > Needless to say, integrals, exact or numeric, that appear in the course > of one's research are also quite important (especially to the > researcher). In determining priority levels for purposes of triage, this > question of origin is one thing I tend to take into account. Examples > that exist merely to illustrate pathology are regarded as interesting, > but not, in general, as high priority bugs. > > Victor Moll also sometimes sends such examples. > That is to say, he sometimes sends fairly interesting examples and not the merely pathologically buggy variety. Daniel Lichtblau Wolfram Research

**References**:**strange behavior of Integrate***From:*dimitris <dimmechan@yahoo.com>

**Re: strange behavior of Integrate***From:*dimitris <dimmechan@yahoo.com>

**Re: Re: strange behavior of Integrate***From:*Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com>