|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Question about exponent shorthand
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg83831] Re: [mg83803] Question about exponent shorthand
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 04:02:35 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
- References: <200712011038.FAA28030@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
That makes sense to me: I would no more expect to be able to use, say
12.(34) for "readability" yet standing for 12.34 -- actually,
Mathematica would interpret the former as a product of 12. with 34 --
than I would be able to use 1*^(-5). The direct, explicit notation for
a number doesn't allow parenthesis punctuation within in.
But if you don't want to sacrifice the readability of parentheses, you
could of course use 10^(-5). Or, better yet, use superscripts on 10 in
StandardForm input for powers.
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I've just got used to using the character shortcut *^ to stand for "times
> 10 to the power of". As expected, these two expressions work:
> 1*^5 --> 100000
> 1*^-5 --> 1/100000
>
> But putting parentheses around the exponent (as I'd prefer to do for
> readability) leads to
>
> Input: 1*^ (-5)
>
> Output: Syntax::sntxb:Expression cannot begin with "1.(-5)".
>
> Syntax::tsntxi:"1.^" is incomplete; more input is needed.
>
> Syntax::sntxi:Incomplete expression; more input is needed.
>
>
> This is on
>
> In[45]:= $Version
>
> Out[45]= "6.0 for Linux x86 (32-bit) (June 19, 2007)"
>
>
> Any clues?
>
>
>
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
Re: Can't Save Style Sheet with Notebook
Next by Date:
Re: Re: how draw box with open front
Previous by thread:
Question about exponent shorthand
Next by thread:
Re: Question about exponent shorthand
|