Re: Re: Re: Mathematica: Long divison for polynomials

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg84031] Re: [mg84004] Re: [mg83975] Re: Mathematica: Long divison for polynomials*From*: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>*Date*: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 03:05:22 -0500 (EST)*References*: <200711301018.FAA04867@smc.vnet.net> <firel5$rsq$1@smc.vnet.net> <200712060737.CAA10055@smc.vnet.net> <32895865.1196967881301.JavaMail.root@m35>*Reply-to*: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com

Ditto. Some of my posts shouldn't go through either! Bobby On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:19:44 -0600, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > > On 6 Dec 2007, at 16:37, Caren Balea wrote: > >> Thank you for your answers! >> >> As the reply in the newsgroup is quite slow I did try a different >> newsgroup >> and receive an answer right after 21 minutes (rather than to have to >> wait >> a whole day in this newsgroup): >> >> http://groups.google.it/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/bd8e9a5475af5fe9?hl=it >> >> There is also an interesting discussion about how meaningful it is >> to have a moderation in this particular newsgroup. >> >> Frankly, I agree with what they are saying. >> I'm curious though whether my post is going to be displayed or not. >> > > Clearly it was. I think there is a place both for moderated and > unmoderated groups of this kind. I, for one, on principle avoid > participating in the second kind. In order to be able to tell how > "meaningful" it is to have moderation in this particular newsgroup you > would have to know some of the posts that got stopped by the > moderator. I personally find the moderator very useful even though, or > rather because, a few of them were mine. > > -- DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com

**References**:**Re: Mathematica: Long divison for polynomials***From:*Caren Balea <caren_balea@xemail.de>