[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Re: Re: v6: still no multiple undo?
The result of undo and redo that one would expect in the case of Dynamic objects would seem to be particularly thorny! David Reiss wrote: > > ...I do think though that Undo is tricky in Mathematica. One reason is > that some of what one does and might want to undo can be **very** > large. Another is the question of what one means by Undo and redo. > Does this include evaluations? -- Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305