MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: v6: still no multiple undo?

The result of undo and redo that one would expect in the case of Dynamic 
objects would seem to be particularly thorny!

David Reiss wrote:
> ...I do think though that Undo is tricky in Mathematica.  One reason is
> that some of what one does and might want to undo can be **very**
> large.  Another is the question of what one means by Undo and redo.
> Does this include evaluations? 

Murray Eisenberg                     murray at
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts                413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street            fax   413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305

  • Prev by Date: Re-defining Log over it's branch cut
  • Next by Date: Re: Selecting Sub-lists After Split
  • Previous by thread: Re: v6: still no multiple undo?
  • Next by thread: Re: v6: still no multiple undo?