[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: v6: still no multiple undo?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg77468] Re: [mg77431] Re: v6: still no multiple undo?
• From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
• Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 05:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
• References: <200706061043.GAA23197@smc.vnet.net><f48dk7$b36$1@smc.vnet.net> <200706080937.FAA03666@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu

The result of undo and redo that one would expect in the case of Dynamic 
objects would seem to be particularly thorny!

David Reiss wrote:
> 
> ...I do think though that Undo is tricky in Mathematica.  One reason is
> that some of what one does and might want to undo can be **very**
> large.  Another is the question of what one means by Undo and redo.
> Does this include evaluations? 

-- 
Murray Eisenberg                     murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts                413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street            fax   413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305

• References:
  • v6: still no multiple undo?
    • From: Will Robertson <wspr81@gmail.com>
  • Re: v6: still no multiple undo?
    • From: David Reiss <dbreiss@gmail.com>