MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: numerical integration problem

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg77868] Re: numerical integration problem
  • From: dh <dh at>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f532hu$36j$>

Hi Sean,

you could e.g. numerically approximate your function x[w] using 

FunctionInterpolation or even Interpolation. Afterwards, the integration 

should be easy.

hope this helps, Daniel

Sean wrote:

> Hi, 

>   I know that to post a technical question here, it is best to give an example.

>   But my program is huge but straightforward, so I hope to make clear my problem by simply describing how I design the program.


>   My problem at hand is that I have a list of linearly coupled equations whose coefficients are normal functions of some parameters. 

>   for a simple example


>    x*f[w]+y*g[w]=z[w];

>   x*b[w]+y*m[w]=n[w];


>  I need to solve for x and y. Of course, the naive way is to put these equations into a matrix and solve for x and y----remember my problem has a 20 X 20 matrix. After this, x and y are expressed in terms of these functions. I just defind them as


> x[w_]:=...;

> y[w_]:=...;

> Now I need to do a numerical integration over these functions x[w], and y[w].. But the trouble comes. Because of these huge expressions for the target functions x[w] and y[w], my dram is immediately eaten up and mathematica automatically terminates the program...

> I read in a previous post 

> that suggests if I redefine 

> x[w_?NumerQ];= ... ;

> y[w_?NumerQ]:=...;


> Would this help, or there is a smarter way of fomulating my problem so that it would run faster and use less memory.


> Your help is greatly appreciated,


> Sean


  • Prev by Date: Re: Normally Distributed Random Matrix
  • Next by Date: Error message
  • Previous by thread: numerical integration problem
  • Next by thread: Re: numerical integration problem