|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: PrimePi and limit of argument
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg78087] Re: [mg77911] PrimePi and limit of argument
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <7566193.1182423757619.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
If you decide to compute PrimePi[100] by hand, you might take a piece of
paper and write down the primes up to 97, then count them. If you try the
same method for PrimePi[10^15], you'll need a bigger piece of paper.
But you'll need a lot MORE than a bigger piece of paper -- you'll need a
smarter algorithm, or you'll never live long enough. And that's what
Mathematica is telling you; the PrimePi method has an upper ceiling,
independent of how big your machine might be.
You may as well demand a general solution in radicals for 7th-degree
polynomials.
7 isn't a large number, but even so, it can't be done... even if your
machine is bigger than the universe.
Bobby
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:47:55 -0500, Robert Pigeon
<robert.pigeon at videotron.ca> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was playing around with the function PrimePi[] and trying different
> arguments. When I tried PrimePi[10^15] I got the error message saying
> that
> the argument is too large for this implementation. I know that it is a
> large
> number.! When I use 10^14 as the argument I get an answer, it takes a
> while
> but I get an answer.
>
> I tried this on a PC running Vista Home Premium 64-bit with Mathematica
> 6.
> Then I tried the same thing under Windows XP 32-bit. There was no
> difference, I got an answer for 10^14 and same error message with 10^15.
>
>
> My question is: I thought that with a 64-bit computer I could use larger
> numbers.! Maybe I am misunderstanding something here, so please help me
> understand J
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Robert
>
>
> Robert Pigeon
>
>
--
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: Integrate modified in version 6?
Next by Date:
Re: Mind+Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: PrimePi and limit of argument
Next by thread:
Re: Re: PrimePi and limit of argument
|