|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Normal for Limit
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg74283] Re: Normal for Limit
- From: "Sebastian Meznaric" <meznaric at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:53:30 -0500 (EST)
- References: <etcnik$9c3$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Mar 15, 5:15 pm, Mr Ajit Sen <senr... at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear MathGroup,
>
> I refer to Andrzej Kozlowski's post where
> he recommended the use of Series to find limits, and
> then used Normal with Landau symbols (big O).
>
> I therefore deduced (incorrectly ?) that
>
> Limit[f[x],x->p] === Normal[f[x]+ O[x,p]],
>
> except when p is a "pole".
>
> So, is there a work around, still using Normal, to
> obtain +/- Infinity?
>
> My guess is that we might have to modify the args
> of the O. But I might be wrong.
>
> I'd be grateful for any help.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> Ajit Sen.
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Can you post the function you're using?
Prev by Date:
Re: Mathematica 4.0
Next by Date:
How to choose real positive solutions?
Previous by thread:
Normal for Limit
Next by thread:
Re:Re: Normal for Limit
|