Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg75845] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 06:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <f21e5e$6e7$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Hi, that's nonsense -- Rectangle[] work as in the versions before with a third argument. Regards Jens rip pelletier wrote: > hi, > > thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a > third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object. > > 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it > was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away, > but....) > > what is the replacement? > > thanks, > rip >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: dimitris <dimmechan@yahoo.com>
- Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle