[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg75845] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
• From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
• Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 06:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Uni Leipzig
• References: <f21e5e$6e7$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de

Hi,

that's nonsense  -- Rectangle[] work as in the
versions before with a third argument.


Regards
   Jens

rip pelletier wrote:
> hi,
> 
> thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a 
> third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object.
> 
> 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it 
> was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away, 
> but....)
> 
> what is the replacement?
> 
> thanks,
>    rip
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: dimitris <dimmechan@yahoo.com>
  • Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>